Legal Opinion
Mrvica v. Esperdy
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided March 30, 1964No. 353PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court 1
376 U.S. 560 (1964)
MRVICA
v.
ESPERDY, DISTRICT DIRECTOR, IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE.
No. 353.
Supreme Court of United States.
Argued March 5, 1964.
Decided March 30, 1964.
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT.
Edith Lowenstein argued the cause and filed a brief for petitioner.
Richard W. Schmude argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Miller, Louis F. Claiborne and Beatrice Rosenberg.
2Opinion of the Court · HarlanJustice Harlan
This case involves construction of the provisions of § 249 of the Immigration and Nationality Act, 66…
Also in this document: Dissent.
3Cases cited6 opinions
- Fong Yue Ting v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
- Rosenberg v. FleutiSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Costello v. Immigration & Naturalization ServiceSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Mrvica v. EsperdySupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Ivan Mrvica v. P. A. Esperdy, District Director, Immigration & Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1963
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by1 opinion
- Gualberto Chavez-Garcia v. Jefferson SessionsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017