Legal Opinion

Monroe v. Kuhlman

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided September 25, 2007No. 06-3609-prPublished

1Opinion of the Court

SUMMARY ORDER

Petitioner-appellant Victor Monroe appeals from a judgment denying habeas corpus relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. We assume the parties’ familiarity with the underlying facts, the prolonged and complex procedural history, and the issues on appeal.

We review the District Court’s denial of the writ de novo. Jimenez v. Walker, 458 F.3d 130, 135 (2d Cir.2006), cert. denied - U.S. -, 127 S.Ct. 976, 166 L.Ed.2d 740 (2007). When a claim has been “adjudicated on the merits in State Court,” our more deferential standard under AEDPA applies. 28 U.S.C. § 2254(d); DeBerry v. Portuondo, 403 F.3d…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Richard Cotto v. Victor Herbert, Warden, Attica Correctional FacilityCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2003
  2. Luis Jimenez v. Hans Walker, Superintendent of Auburn Correctional FacilityCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2006
  3. Darnell Deberry v. Leonard A. PortuondoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2005
  4. Jimenez v. GrahamSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  5. Monroe v. KuhlmanDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API