Legal Opinion

Howe v. Kindred

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided January 31, 1890PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Action to enforce a mechanic’s lien for $3,379.20, brought in the district court for Crow Wing county, and tried by Sleeper, J., who ordered judgment for plaintiffs. After his decease a motion for 'a new trial was denied by Searle, J., and the defendant Kindred appealed.

1Opinion of the CourtCollins, J.

The plaintiffs, as material-men, brought this action to foreclose a lien claimed by them upon certain town lots. Defendants W. H. Leland and Mrs. L. M. Witt, then owners of the lots, entered into a contract with plaintiffs, whereby the latter were to furnish lumber with which the former were to build a hotel upon the premises. The first lumber furnished under this contract was delivered October 5, 1883. On the 27th of November, same year, Witt and Leland executed and delivered a mortgage upon the lots to the defendant Kindred, which has since been duly foreclosed. The year of redemption…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Trullinger v. KofoedOregon Supreme Court · 1879
  2. Gilcrest v. GottschalkSupreme Court of Iowa · 1874
  3. Grant v. StrongSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
  4. Bashor v. Nordyke & Marmon Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1881
  5. Parberry v. Johnson & Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1875

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Martin v. BeckerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
  2. In re BennettCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1907
  3. Minneapolis Builders Supply Co. v. Calhoun Beach Club Holding Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1932
  4. St. Paul Labor Exchange Co. v. EdenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1892
  5. Thompson Lumber Co. v. GruesnerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1929

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API