Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Lee v. Peek

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided May 1, 1962No. 17904Published

1ConcurrenceLewis, Justice

I concur in the result of the opinion of Mr. Justice Bussey because the record fails to show an abuse of the discretion vested in the Court under the provision of Section 10-609 of the 1952 Code of Laws, but I arrive at the conclusion on somewhat different grounds. Disagreement with the wide distinction apparently drawn between the basis for granting-relief under Section 10-609 and Section 10-1213 necessitates, a statement of the reason for my concurrence.

While some of the decisions cited in the opinion of Justice Bussey refer to the discretion of the court as unlimited, it is recognized that…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Simon v. FlowersSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1957
  2. Savage v. CannonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1944
  3. Morgan v. State Farm Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1956
  4. Bishop v. JacobsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1917
  5. Johnson v. FingerSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1915

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API