Legal Opinion

Ellish v. Zoning Board of Appeals of the Town of Ramapo

New York Supreme Court

Decided November 11, 1931PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTaylor, J.

By certiorari under section 349-a of the Town Law (added by Laws of 1926, chap. 714), the petitioner seeks a review of a determination of the board of appeals of the town of Ramapo. Of necessity he must have claimed that there were “ practical difficulties or unnecessary hardships in carrying out the strict letter ” of the building zone ordinance, classifying petitioner’s property as residential. Petitioner desires to use it for an amusement park in which there would be a swimming pool. He is the lessee of the property and has an option to purchase it. In effect he applied to the board for…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Village of Euclid v. Ambler Realty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
  2. Matter of Wulfsohn v. BurdenNew York Court of Appeals · 1925
  3. Matter of Larkin Co. v. SchwabNew York Court of Appeals · 1926
  4. City of Chicago v. M. & M. Hotel Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1910
  5. Matter of Isenbarth v. . BartnettNew York Court of Appeals · 1924

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Nagaven Realties, Inc. v. BanzhafNew York Supreme Court · 1933
  2. Town of North Hempstead v. BialekNew York Supreme Court · 1966

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API