Legal Opinion

Brady v. Pearson Lumber Co.

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided April 22, 1895PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Mechanics’ Liens.—Error in the Circuit Court of Cook County: the Hon. Murray F. Tuley, Judge, presiding. Heard in this court at the March term, 1895.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Gary

On an application by a stranger to this record, a state of facts is verified by affidavit, which, perhaps might have been the basis of pleas in bar of this writ, but which we can not notice under a joinder in error, or since the statute has dispensed with such joinder, upon briefs upon the merits.

The suit is to enforce a mechanic’s lien against Brady as owner of, and, among others, the plaintiff in error L. Jtomeyn Giddings, as claiming an interest in, premises described. The petition shows affirmatively that no lien existed, because there had been no compliance with Sec. 4 of the Lien Act.

The…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Campbell v. JacobsonIllinois Supreme Court · 1893
  2. McDonald v. RosengartenIllinois Supreme Court · 1890
  3. Eberstein v. WilletsIllinois Supreme Court · 1890
  4. McDonald v. RosengartenAppellate Court of Illinois · 1889

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Fried v. BlanchardAppellate Court of Illinois · 1895
  2. Orr & Lockett Hardware Co. v. Needham Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1896

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API