Moody v. State
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Accusation of sale of liquor; from city court of Carrollton— Judge Beall. January 22, 1915.
1Opinion of the CourtRussell, C. J.
I. The failure of the court to charge the jury upon the second “branch” of the rule as to alibi, as required by the rulings of the Supreme Court in Ledford v. State, 75 Ga. 856, and in Harrison v. State, 83 Ga. 129 (9 S. E. 542), was such error as requires the grant of a new trial. Callahan v. State, 14 Ga. App. 442 (81 S. E. 380); Raysor v. State, 132 Ga. 237 (63 S. E. 786). The trial judge is not required, in the absence of a. request, to instruct the jury upon the subject of alibi, but if he sees proper to do so the instruction must be correct. In the , present case the incompleteness of…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Harrison v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1889
- Ledford v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1885
- Callahan v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1914
- Raysor v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1909
3Cited by6 opinions
- Davis v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1949
- Chambers v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1942
- Smith v. SmithDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 1970
- Wafford v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1926
- Brooks v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1920
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.