McLaughlin v. Commonwealth
Court of Appeals of Virginia
1DissentKelsey, J.
Properly framed, the question presented by this case asks only whether the officers had probable cause to believe the CDs were subject to confiscation under Code § 59.1-41.5. Without contradiction, the evidence established that the observable characteristics of these CDs made them clearly recognizable as pirated “DJ mixes”—the kind most frequently *255traded in the black market. The trial court, therefore, properly denied McLaughlin’s suppression motion.
I
Under settled principles, we address the legal issues arising from a suppression motion “only after the relevant historical facts have been…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Carroll v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
- Texas v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Devenpeck v. AlfordSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Maryland v. PringleSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
- Calero-Toledo v. Pearson Yacht Leasing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.