Legal Opinion
Jackson v. Bumgardner
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
Decided November 6, 1984No. 8411SC6Published
1Opinion of the Court
321 S.E.2d 541 (1984)
Varonica L. JACKSON and Rufus H. Jackson
v.
Heath D. BUMGARDNER.
No. 8411SC6.
Court of Appeals of North Carolina.
November 6, 1984.
Nance, Collier, Herndon & Wheless by James R. Nance, Jr., Fayetteville, for plaintiffs-appellants.
Smith, Anderson, Blount, Dorsett, Mitchell & Jernigan by Samuel G. Thompson and Jodee Sparkman King, Raleigh, for defendant-appellee.
WHICHARD, Judge.
In pertinent part, the complaint alleges the following:
Plaintiff-wife consulted defendant, a licensed physician, concerning uterine bleeding. Defendant performed on plaintiff-wife a dilation and curettage…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Roe v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Griswold v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Harbeson v. Parke-Davis, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1983
- Custodio v. BauerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
- Troppi v. ScarfMichigan Court of Appeals · 1971
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.