Legal Opinion
Imperial Ed Promotions, L.L.C. v. Emmanuel Pacquia
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Decided December 18, 2013No. 17-30896UnpublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM: *
This is an appeal from the dismissal with prejudice of a suit by Imperial ED Pro motions, LLC against prominent boxer Emmanuel “Manny” Pacquiao. For the reasons that follow, we affirm the dismissal.
BACKGROUND
In July 2010, Pacquiao entered into a contract to appear at an event in McAllen, Texas. The contract was signed by Pac-quiao and Edmundo Lozano as “Imperial ED Promotions PRODUCER, Edmundo H. Lozano.” Pacquiao was to be paid a total of $200,000 in two installments: one when the agreement was signed, and the second no later than September 3, 2010. Pacquiao failed to attend the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Reginald R. Brinkmann, Jr. v. Dallas County Deputy Sheriff AbnerCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1987
- Mary GLASS, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. PETRO-TEX CHEMICAL CORP., Defendant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1985
- Nickey Brown v. Oil States Skagit SmatcoCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2011
- Floyd Sturgeon v. Airborne Freight Corporation, and Teamsters, Local Union No. 745, Etc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1985
3Cited by6 opinions
- United States v. State of MississippiCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2018
- Amos v. Union, MS Police Dept.District Court, S.D. Mississippi · 2022
- Boudy v. McComb School DistCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2026
- In the Matter of Aries Marine CorporationDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 2023
- Laborfest v. City of San AntonioDistrict Court, W.D. Texas · 2022
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.