Bankers' & Planters' Mutual Insurance v. Archie
Supreme Court of Arkansas
Appeal from Conway Circuit Court,; A. B. Priddy, Judge; STATEMENT OF FACTS. Ed. Archie brought this suit against the Bankers & Planters Mutual Insurance Association to-recover on a benefit certificate in the sum of $450. In September, 1916, the Bankers’ & Planters’ Mutual Insurance Association issued a benefit life certificate to Mary Archie, and her husband, Ed. Archie, was named as the beneficiary.
Read the full summary
Appeal from Conway Circuit Court,; A. B. Priddy, Judge; STATEMENT OF FACTS. Ed. Archie brought this suit against the Bankers & Planters Mutual Insurance Association to-recover on a benefit certificate in the sum of $450. In September, 1916, the Bankers’ & Planters’ Mutual Insurance Association issued a benefit life certificate to Mary Archie, and her husband, Ed. Archie, was named as the beneficiary. She kept the dues paid thereon until the time of her death in August, 1919. The benefit certificate provided that the application for membership should be considered as a part of the contract for…
1Opinion of the CourtHart, J.
(after stating the facts). We set out the testimony somewhat in detail because it is earnestly insisted hv counsel for the defendant that the evidence is not sufficient to support the verdict.
It was the contention of the plaintiff that the compromise was effected by fraudulent conduct and misrepresentation on the part of Bohlinger. Counsel ,for the deféndant insists that there is no testimony upon which to submit this question to the jury, and this in contention we think counsel is correct. In her application, the insured stated her age to be under fifty-five. Persons over the age of…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- First National Bank v. AllenSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1919
3Cited by2 opinions
- Citizens' National Bank v. GannonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1923
- International Order of Daniel v. GreenSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1930