People v. Huertas
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed.
The alleged agreement between defendant and the prosecutor was never placed on the record or approved by the County Court Judge. Accordingly, defendant cannot now insist that the courts recognize or enforce it (see, People v Curdgel, 83 NY2d 862, 864; People v Danny G., 61 NY2d 169). Since his codefendant pleaded guilty before trial, it cannot be said that the People obtained any concrete benefit from defendant’s agreement to testify against that individual. Defense counsel’s claim that defendant’s agreement…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- People v. Danny G.New York Court of Appeals · 1984
- People v. CurdgelNew York Court of Appeals · 1994
3Cited by14 opinions
- People v. MalloyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017
- People v. HillAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
- People v. StevensAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- People v. RobertsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
- People v. WatfordAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.