Legal Opinion · Dissent

Claim of Ortega v. New York State & Local Police & Fire Retirement

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided August 1, 1991Published

1DissentMikoll, J.

We respectfully dissent. There is a rational distinction for allowing reimbursement of benefits paid in injured-person situations and not for death benefits paid. The losses are different and their compensation under the Workers’ Compensation Law takes such divergence in type of damages into account.

Under the plain language of Workers’ Compensation Law § 33 entitled "Assignments; exemptions”, "[compensation or benefits due under [the Workers’ Compensation Law] shall not be assigned, released or commuted except as provided by [the Workers’ Compensation Law]”. This provision expresses a clear…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Claim of Goodman v. Pollio Dairy ProductsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
  2. Claim of Schrider v. National Distillers & Chemical Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1976
  3. Claim of Craig v. Western Electric Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API