Legal Opinion

Whitley v. Mammoth Life & Accident Insurance Co.

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided November 19, 1954PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CULLEN, Commissioner.

Willie ,W.. Whitiey and W. C. .Buford, both of whom are stockholders, and one of whom is a director,' of the Mammoth Life and Accident Insurance. Company, brp.ught a stockholders’ suit against Robert Holloman, seeking to establish the • rights of'the company with respect to an alleged pension fund trust of, which Holloman was alleged to be trustee. The company was named both as a plaintiff and a defendant. Later, by direction of the court, two employees of the - company were named as defendants, representing all employees.

The court dismissed the complaint, as several'…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Psutka v. Michigan Alkali Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1936
  2. Stewart v. Wisconsin Steel Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1919

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. General Electric Co. v. MartinCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1978
  2. Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion, Texas Attorney General Reports2001
  3. Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion, Texas Attorney General Reports1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API