Legal Opinion

Swedenburg v. Copeland

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided August 18, 1955No. 6 Div. 862PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

This suit was brought by the buyers (plaintiffs) against the seller (defendant) because of the breach of a contract for the sale of one hundred and sixty-two bales of cotton at a fixed price. There were verdict and judgment for plaintiffs fixing their damages at $1,620. The appeal is by defendant.

There was no controversy as to the validity and effect of a contract to sell the cotton at forty-one cents a pound being made and signed by defendant (appellant) at about 10:00 or 10:30 on the morning of November 9, 1951, after plaintiffs, earlier that morning, had obtained an option from defendant…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Donnell v. JonesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1848
  2. McFadden & Bro. v. HendersonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1900
  3. Bell v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1885
  4. Western Union Tel. Co. v. FavishSupreme Court of Alabama · 1916
  5. Central of Georgia Ry. Co. v. AshleySupreme Court of Alabama · 1909

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Roan v. McCalebSupreme Court of Alabama · 1955
  2. Lauderdale County Cooperative, Inc. v. LansdellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1955
  3. Bayliss MacHine & Welding Co. v. Huntsville Ice & Coal Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1956

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API