Legal Opinion

Mooney v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided October 15, 1970No. 45547PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Deen, Judge.

1. On trial of the defendant for burglary, testimony of the owner that all doors and windows were locked when she left the house, and that as to the carport door the inside door was locked with a key and the screen door unlocked, but that when she returned the screen door was'locked and the inside door was standing open, plus proof that no authorized person had entered the house in the meantime, authorizes an inference of breaking under Code § 26-2401. There need be no physical violence done at the point of entry, and the breaking may consist of unlawfully unlocking a locked door.…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Anthony v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1951
  2. Cheatham v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1938
  3. Hampton v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1909
  4. Anderson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1969
  5. Law v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1962

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Barnett v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1980
  2. Prescott v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1982
  3. Braden v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1975
  4. Vaughn v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1975
  5. In the Interest of H. A.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2011

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API