Legal Opinion

United States v. James Buchanan Duke

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Decided April 23, 1969No. 12414PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HAYNSWORTH, Chief Judge:

A number of questions are presented by this appeal from a conviction of bank robbery.

We need not detail all of the evidence supporting the verdict. Some of it was circumstantial and much of it was dependent upon the defendant’s own admissions. Collectively, it is more than sufficient to support a finding of guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.

Complaint, however, is made as to the admission of the defendant’s statements to FBI agents on the afternoon of the robbery and on the following afternoon. While the giving of Miranda warnings is conceded, the claim is made that the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Nye & Nissen v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  3. United States v. Percy HarrisCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1965

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. United States v. Edwin Sanchez, United States of America v. Gregorio Rosario, United States of America v. Rafael SanchezCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1990
  2. United States v. PetersonCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1975
  3. Tichnell v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1983
  4. People v. JacksonIllinois Supreme Court · 1977
  5. Turner v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1980

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API