Legal Opinion

Hepworth v. Union Ferry Co.

New York Supreme Court

Decided December 14, 1891PublishedCited by 12 opinions

Appeal from special term, Kings county. Action by Matthew Gaunt Hepworth against the Union Ferry Company of Brooklyn. The charter of the defendant expired pending the action, and from an order continuing the action against its directors as trustees defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtBarnard, P. J.

On the 9th of June, 1889, the plaintiff handed to the defendant’s ticket-seller, in New York, money for a passage across the river to Brooklyn. The defendant kept his money, refused a ticket, and committed an assault on him, and forcibly put him in the street. The plaintiff commenced an action for the assault in October, 1889. The corporation denied the facts on which the plaintiff based his complaint, and, while the action was at issue and untried, the charter of the defendant expired by its own limitation. The Revised Statutes provide that on a dissolution of a corporation the directors…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. McCulloch v. . NorwoodNew York Court of Appeals · 1874
  2. Baker v. GilmanNew York Supreme Court · 1868

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. People v. Troy Steel & Iron Co.New York Supreme Court · 1894
  2. Sherill Hardwood Lumber Co. v. New York Bottle Box Co.New York Supreme Court · 1922
  3. Grafton v. Union Ferry Co.New York City Court · 1892
  4. In re Directors of Yuengling Bee Wing Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1897
  5. Mabon v. D. G. Yuengling Brewing Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1897

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API