People v. Caryl
New York Supreme Court
The prisoner was indicted at the Erie oyer and terminer for stealing within this state a number of bank bills, purporting to have been issued by the Bank of Upper Canada, and by the Hancock Bank, in the state of Massachusetts.
Read the full summary
The prisoner was indicted at the Erie oyer and terminer for stealing within this state a number of bank bills, purporting to have been issued by the Bank of Upper Canada, and by the Hancock Bank, in the state of Massachusetts. He was tried and convicted, and his sentence was suspended until the advice of this court could be obtained upon the question whether, in such a case, the public prosecutor was bound to prove the existence of the banks and the genuineness of the bills, no such proof having been adduced on the trial.
1Opinion of the Court
This Coukt were of opinion, that at least prima facie evidence ought to have been given, that there were sueh banks in existence, and that the bills were genuine; that it would not be necessary, in such a case, to produce the highest evidence of the existence of the banks, such as proof of the original characters or acts of the government incorporating the companies; but that proof that there were such banks defacto would be sufficient. And so, as to the bills, it was not neces*548sary to prove, by positive testimony, that the names subscribed to them were in the hand-writing of the officers of…
2Cited by10 opinions
- Smith v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1867
- Johnson v. PeopleNew York Supreme Court · 1847
- State v. HabibSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1894
- Crawford v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1850
- Williams v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1872
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.