Leventhal v. Army-Navy Realty, Inc.

By JUDGE CHARLES S. RUSSELL

Having reviewed the evidence heard ore tenus on May 17, 1971, the memoranda of counsel and the authorities therein cited, I am of the opinion that the plaintiff is entitled to judgment against the individual defendant, Robert W. Maher, but not against the corporate defendant, Army-Navy Properties, Inc.

Defendants having obtained leave of court to reopen their case for the purpose of showing that a stock statement was duly filed with the State Corporation Commission pursuant to law, have done so. Accordingly, the sole question remaining is whether Army-Navy Realty…