Legal Opinion

Cochran v. Lovelace

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided July 3, 1973No. 55354PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RAWLINGS, Justice.

Plaintiffs instituted a dram shop action under The Code 1966, chapter 123 (Iowa Liquor Control Act) against defendants, liquor suppliers and surety on their bond. From trial court order overruling defendant surety’s motion to dismiss as to it this appeal is permissibly taken. We reverse.

To the extent here relevant plaintiffs, by their six division petition, seek redress from defendants as liquor licensees and permittees (licensees). Also made a party defendant is Merchants Mutual Bonding Company (Merchants), surety on the statutory bond posted by said licensees.

Defendant…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Davenport Water Co. v. Iowa State Commerce CommissionSupreme Court of Iowa · 1971
  2. General Electric Company v. Southern Construction Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1967
  3. Wendelin v. RussellSupreme Court of Iowa · 1966
  4. McKillip v. ZimmermanSupreme Court of Iowa · 1971
  5. State Ex Rel. Turner v. Koscot Interplanetary, Inc.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1971

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Baker v. BealSupreme Court of Iowa · 1975
  2. Haafke v. MitchellSupreme Court of Iowa · 1984
  3. Cochran v. LovelaceSupreme Court of Iowa · 1973
  4. Haafke v. MitchellSupreme Court of Iowa · 1984
  5. Haafke v. MitchellSupreme Court of Iowa · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API