Legal Opinion

People v. Orr

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Decided December 29, 2005Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

Judgment of conviction unanimously affirmed.

At trial, defendants conceded that they operated the premises in violation of the ordinance (Bayville Village Code § 80-45 [B] [5]), but claimed that they had a valid preexisting nonconforming use. A nonconforming use is generally referred to as a use of land which lawfully existed prior to the enactment of the zoning ordinance, and which is maintained after the effective date of the ordinance although it does not comply with the use restrictions applicable to the area in which it is situated (1 Salkin, New York Zoning…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. People v. MillerNew York Court of Appeals · 1952
  2. People v. Kollender, New York County Courts1939
  3. Village of Waterford v. O'BrienAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1972
  4. Fleury v. TOWN OF ESSEX ZONING BD.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API