Legal Opinion

Flint v. Commonwealth

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided May 29, 1883PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Case 31 — INDICTMENT APPEAL FROM DAVIESS CIRCUIT COURT. 1. An indictment under section 2, article 6, chapter 29, General Statutes, must .contain the word “willfully.” (Commonwealth v. Morgan, 11 Bush, 601; Same v. Iiawldns, 11 Bush, 603; Bishop on Criminal Law, 4th ed., 2d vol., secs. 717, 741, 742, 761; 33 Ala., 413.) 2. The court permitted incompetent evidence. 3. The court misinstructed the jury.

Read the full summary

Case 31 — INDICTMENT APPEAL FROM DAVIESS CIRCUIT COURT. 1. An indictment under section 2, article 6, chapter 29, General Statutes, must .contain the word “willfully.” (Commonwealth v. Morgan, 11 Bush, 601; Same v. Iiawldns, 11 Bush, 603; Bishop on Criminal Law, 4th ed., 2d vol., secs. 717, 741, 742, 761; 33 Ala., 413.) 2. The court permitted incompetent evidence. 3. The court misinstructed the jury. (Nichols v. Commonwealth, 11 Bush, 585-’6; Commonwealth v. Jones, 10 Bush, 728; Criminal Code, secs. 120 and 215; Commonwealth v. Yancey, 2' Duv., 375; Bapp v. Commonwealth, 14 B. M., 620; Wilson…

1Opinion of the Court

JUDGE LEWIS

DELIVERED the opinion of the court.-

The charge in the indictment in this case, that “the defendant did unlawfully, feloniously, and maliciously, with intent.to kill him, cut and wound one Philip Yeiser,” is sufficient under section 2, article 6, chapter 29, General Statutes; for the words used import an exercise of the will, and convey the same idea as do those contained in the section referred to.

2. It is assigned as an error that the court permitted the attorney for the commonwealth to state, in .the presence of the jury, what he expected to prove by the witness Spicer, the…

2Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. RodriguezNevada Supreme Court · 1909
  2. Howenstine v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1920
  3. State v. MoonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1914
  4. L. & N. R. R. v. Johnson Admx.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1895
  5. Lindsay v. PettigrewSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1892

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API