Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Genesco, Inc. v. 33 North Lasalle Partners, L.P.

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided May 28, 2008No. 1-07-2782, 1-07-3076 consPublished

1Concurrence

JUSTICE THEIS,

specially concurring:

In this case, the majority finds that equity should not excuse plaintiff from strict compliance with the terms of the termination option of its lease. I agree with the majority’s reasoning and holding, but write separately to explain the equitable relief that plaintiff requests. I will also explain why these equitable principles do not aid plaintiff in this case.

It is well settled that a court may exercise its equitable powers to relieve a party of strict compliance with the requirements of exercising an option in a lease agreement where there has been an…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Andrews v. BlakeArizona Supreme Court · 2003
  2. F. B. Fountain Co. v. SteinSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1922
  3. Dikeman v. Sunday Creek Coal Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1900
  4. Thomson Learning, Inc. v. Olympia Properties, LLCAppellate Court of Illinois · 2006
  5. Linn Corp. v. LaSalle National BankAppellate Court of Illinois · 1981

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API