Genesco, Inc. v. 33 North Lasalle Partners, L.P.
Appellate Court of Illinois
1Concurrence
JUSTICE THEIS,
specially concurring:
In this case, the majority finds that equity should not excuse plaintiff from strict compliance with the terms of the termination option of its lease. I agree with the majority’s reasoning and holding, but write separately to explain the equitable relief that plaintiff requests. I will also explain why these equitable principles do not aid plaintiff in this case.
It is well settled that a court may exercise its equitable powers to relieve a party of strict compliance with the requirements of exercising an option in a lease agreement where there has been an…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Andrews v. BlakeArizona Supreme Court · 2003
- F. B. Fountain Co. v. SteinSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1922
- Dikeman v. Sunday Creek Coal Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1900
- Thomson Learning, Inc. v. Olympia Properties, LLCAppellate Court of Illinois · 2006
- Linn Corp. v. LaSalle National BankAppellate Court of Illinois · 1981
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.