Legal Opinion
Mermelstein v. Haner
District Court, W.D. Virginia
Decided August 2, 1977No. Civ. A. 76-0261PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND JUDGMENT
DALTON, District Judge.
This action is currently before the court on defendant’s motion to dismiss plaintiff’s complaint pursuant to Rule 12(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Both parties to this action presented various memoranda, affidavits, depositions, and exhibits in support of their respective positions. Accordingly, the court now considers defendant’s motion as one for summary judgment under Rule 56 of the Federal Rules, pursuant to the requirements of Rule 12(b).
STATEMENT OF THE FACTS
The plaintiff, Lothar Mermelstein, was hired in 1970 as the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Perry v. SindermannSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Bishop v. WoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Arnett v. KennedySupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Port of Portland v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Hartman v. City of ProvidenceDistrict Court, D. Rhode Island · 1986
- Digiacinto v. Harford County, Md.District Court, D. Maryland · 1993
- Mandel v. AllenDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 1995
- Velasquez v. Department of Higher EducationColorado Court of Appeals · 2003
- Mermelstein v. HanerCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1978