Legal Opinion

State v. Quenzer

Idaho Court of Appeals

Decided March 23, 1987No. 16493PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WALTERS, Chief Judge.

Following a bench trial, a magistrate found Curtis Quenzer guilty of knowingly driving while his license was suspended. The judgment of conviction was affirmed on appeal to the district court. Quenzer now appeals to this Court, urging that his judgment of conviction be reversed on the ground that he did not know that his license was suspended at the time of his arrest. We affirm.

The record reveals the following undisputed facts. On September 1, 1984, a Post Falls, Idaho, police officer stopped seventeen-year old Curtis Quenzer for speeding. During that stop, the officer…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
  2. Bell v. BursonSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. State v. CollovaWisconsin Supreme Court · 1977
  4. In Re MurdockCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  5. State v. ThomasCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1980

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Rodell v. NelsonIdaho Court of Appeals · 1988
  2. State v. BirdIdaho Court of Appeals · 1990
  3. MacDonald v. EngleMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API