Legal Opinion

The A. C. & H. M. Hall Realty Co. v. Moos

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided February 17, 1922PublishedCited by 13 opinions

Appeal by the plaintiff, The A. C. & H. M. Hall Realty Company, from an order and determination of the Appellate Term of the Supreme Court, First Department, entered in the office of the clerk of the county of New York on the 9th day of June, 1921, reversing a judgment of the Municipal Court of the City of New York, Borough of Manhattan, Fifth District, in favor of the plaintiff, and directing a new trial. (See 115 Mise. Rep. 506.)

1Opinion of the Court

Greenbaum, J.:

Sixteen cases are involved in this appeal. They were tried together under a stipulation that the same evidence should be applicable to all of them.

*68The pleadings in all of the cases are substantially alike. The complaint alleges that the defendant was in possession of certain designated apartments in one of the two adjoining apartment houses located respectively at 251 and 255 West Ninety-eighth street, borough of Manhattan, under a written lease from the plaintiff, which expired on September 30, 1920, and that defendant wrongfully held over and continued in possession after the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. City of Knoxville v. Knoxville Water Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1909

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Troy Hills Vil. v. Tp. Council Tp. Parsippany-Troy HillsSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1975
  2. Wilson v. BrownEmergency Court of Appeals · 1943
  3. Matter of Fifth Madison Corp. (New York Tel. Co.)New York Court of Appeals · 1948
  4. Markwin Realty Corp. v. GeislerAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1924
  5. 86 Near Second Avenue Corp. v. FennekohlCity of New York Municipal Court · 1946

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API