Washington Water Jet Workers Ass'n v. Yarbrough
Washington Supreme Court
1DissentChambers, J.
(dissenting) — After due deliberation, our founders renounced a significant commodity: the State’s historical power to sell the involuntary labor of prisoners on the open market. Today, we must decide whether our founders incidentally prohibited prisoners from entering into employment relationships with private entities, a labor relationship unheard of in the nineteenth century. Because we conclude that article II, section 29 of the Washington Constitution did not contemplate, let alone forbid, private employment of prisoners, we dissent.
ANALYSIS
History is critical to our analysis because we…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- People v. . HawkinsNew York Court of Appeals · 1898
- State ex rel. Greaves v. HenryMississippi Supreme Court · 1905
- State v. BrunnWashington Supreme Court · 1945
- State Ex Rel. P.U.D. Etc. v. WylieWashington Supreme Court · 1947
- State ex rel. Davis v. MortensenNebraska Supreme Court · 1903
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.