Legal Opinion
Siu Say v. Nagle
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided February 4, 1924No. 4103PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RUDKIN, Circuit Judge.
On the 19th day of April, 1923, Sui Mooy Chew applied to enter the United States at the port of San Francisco as the minor son of Siu Say, a domiciled Chinese merchant. The status of the alleged father is not questioned, but the Commissioner of Immigration denied the right of entry upon the ground that the relationship had not been established. This decision was affirmed on appeal by the Secretary of Labor, and a writ of habeas corpus was thereupon applied for, upon the ground that the testimony in support of the right of entry was of so conclusive a character that it…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- The Santissima Trinidad.Supreme Court of the United States · 1822
3Cited by9 opinions
- Lew Wah Fook, as Guardian Ad Litem for Lew Suey Yet, Also Known as Lew Thew Yut v. Herbert Brownell, Jr., as Attorney General of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1955
- Nagle v. Dong MingCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1928
- Jung Sam v. HaffCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1940
- Tom Him v. NagleCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1928
- Gan Seow Tung v. ClarkDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1949
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.