Legal Opinion

Plati v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided August 19, 2011No. 11-161TPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

FIRESTONE, Judge.

Irene A. Plati (“Ms. Plati”), the pro se plaintiff in this case, through her son and attorney-in-fact, Joseph G. Plati (“Mr. Pla-ti”), seeks a refund of $2751 in tax that she paid through withholding for tax year 2004. The Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”) denied the plaintiffs claim for a refund on the grounds that she had forfeited her refund by filing her return and refund claim more than three years after she had paid the tax, plus extensions, pursuant to Internal Revenue Code (“I.R.C.”) § 6511(b)(2)(A). The plaintiff contends that the IRS improperly denied her…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  3. Arbaugh v. Y & H Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2006
  4. McNutt v. General Motors Acceptance Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
  5. Hughes v. RoweSupreme Court of the United States · 1980

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Murdock v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2012
  2. Stauffer v. Internal Revenue ServiceCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2019
  3. Olga E. Martinez v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API