Queen v. State Accident Insurance Fund Corp.
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtVan Hoomissen, J.
Claimant appeals a decision of the Workers’ Compensation Board that reversed a hearings referee’s ruling that claimant’s heart problems were compensably related to his work activity as a woods foreman. The issue is whether claimant has proved by a preponderance of the evidence that his work activity was a major contributing cause of his heart condition. We affirm.
Claimant was age 55 at the onset of his disability. He was employed as a foreman for a logging operation. During the summer of 1978, he had experienced episodes of numbness in his left arm and shortness of breath at work. On August 7…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Coday v. WILLAMETTE TUG & BARGE COMPANYOregon Supreme Court · 1968
- Clayton v. State Compensation DepartmentOregon Supreme Court · 1969
- Bales v. State Accident Insurance Fund Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1982
- Gormley v. State Accident Insurance Fund Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1981
- Lenox v. State Accident Insurance Fund Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1981
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Thomas Take and Janice Take v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- Horizon Air Industries, Inc. v. Davis-WarrenCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2014
- Paige v. SAIF Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1985