Legal Opinion

Queen v. State Accident Insurance Fund Corp.

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided February 16, 1983No. 79-03862; CA A24338PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtVan Hoomissen, J.

Claimant appeals a decision of the Workers’ Compensation Board that reversed a hearings referee’s ruling that claimant’s heart problems were compensably related to his work activity as a woods foreman. The issue is whether claimant has proved by a preponderance of the evidence that his work activity was a major contributing cause of his heart condition. We affirm.

Claimant was age 55 at the onset of his disability. He was employed as a foreman for a logging operation. During the summer of 1978, he had experienced episodes of numbness in his left arm and shortness of breath at work. On August 7…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Coday v. WILLAMETTE TUG & BARGE COMPANYOregon Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Clayton v. State Compensation DepartmentOregon Supreme Court · 1969
  3. Bales v. State Accident Insurance Fund Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1982
  4. Gormley v. State Accident Insurance Fund Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1981
  5. Lenox v. State Accident Insurance Fund Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1981

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Thomas Take and Janice Take v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
  2. Horizon Air Industries, Inc. v. Davis-WarrenCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2014
  3. Paige v. SAIF Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API