Legal Opinion
United States v. William Allred, Antoine Haddad, Lou Milhous, Soren Hansen, and Donallco, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Decided March 2, 1989No. 87-5625PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
JOHNSON, Circuit Judge:
Appellants William Allred, Antoine Had-dad, Lou Milhous, Soren Hansen, Donailco, Inc. and six other Donailco owners, officers or employees 1 were charged with conspiring to defraud the United States in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 371. 2 Counts Two through Five charged Allred, Haddad and Donallco with making false or fraudulent statements to an agency of the United States (the Air Force) in connection with contracts for surplus aircraft parts in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1001. 3 The case was tried before a jury.
Of the appellants, Allred was convicted on the conspiracy to…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Glasser v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Irvin v. DowdSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Remmer v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
- Dennis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- United States v. Nelson BellCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1982
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Russell A. Tinsley v. Bob BorgCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- United States v. NapoleonCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1997
- United States v. GravesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1993
- United States v. Joann MitcheltreeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1991
- United States v. Humberto Hinojosa and Carlos LermaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1992
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.