Legal Opinion

Muza v. Niketown New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 5, 2000PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Louise Gruner Gans, J.), entered on or about January 14, 2000, which, to the extent appealed from, denied defendant Niketown New York’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as such motion sought dismissal of plaintiffs false arrest, unlawful detention and assault causes of action, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

In this action, where plaintiff, a correction officer, was detained at Niketown and subsequently arrested for making purchases of clothing with purportedly fraudulent credit cards, *14summary judgment was properly denied.…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Ryan v. New York Telephone Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1984
  2. Luppo v. Waldbaum, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Restrepo v. Home Depot U.S.A., Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
  2. Cain v. County of Niagara, New YorkDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2022
  3. Cain v. County of Niagara, New YorkDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API