Legal Opinion

Unami v. Roshan

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided March 17, 2008No. A07A2137PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Bernes, Judge.

Appellee, Hanif Roshan, filed this breach of contract action seeking to recover funds owed to him under the terms of a settlement agreement personally guaranteed by appellant, Madatali Unami d/b/a Nice Check Cashing, Inc. Unami appeals the trial court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of Roshan. Unami contends the trial court’s decision was erroneous in light of evidence that Roshan breached a confidentiality provision of the settlement agreement. Because we conclude that the confidentiality provision was void as a matter of public policy, we find no error and affirm.

Summary…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Matjoulis v. Integon General Ins. Corp.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1997
  2. Camp v. EichelkrautCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2000
  3. Hassell v. FIRST NAT. BANK OF NEWTON CTYCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1995
  4. Gilbert v. City of JacksonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2007
  5. Barger v. Garden Way, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1998

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. EDDYSTONE RAIL COMPANY, LLC v. BRIDGER LOGISTICS, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2021
  2. Redacted v. RedactedDistrict Court, M.D. Georgia · 2018
  3. Signapori v. JagariaAppellate Court of Illinois · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API