Legal Opinion

Howell v. Skody

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided January 24, 2012PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The defendant met her prima facie burden of showing that the plaintiff did not sustain a serious injury within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102 (d) as a result of the subject accident (see Toure v Avis Rent A Car Sys., 98 NY2d 345 [2002]; Gaddy v Eyler, 79 NY2d 955, 956-957 [1992]). The plaintiff alleged, inter alia, that as a result of the subject accident, she sustained certain injuries to the cervical and lumbar regions of her spine. The defendant submitted evidence establishing, prima facie, that the alleged injuries to those regions of the plaintiffs spine did not constitute serious…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Toure v. Avis Rent a Car Systems, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 2002
  2. Gaddy v. EylerNew York Court of Appeals · 1992
  3. Pommells v. PerezNew York Court of Appeals · 2005
  4. Perl v. MeherNew York Court of Appeals · 2011
  5. Staff v. Mair YshuaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Cruz v. Advanced Concrete Leasing Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
  2. Cruz v. Advanced Concrete Leasing Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API