Legal Opinion
Adams v. Bisignano
District Court, D. Minnesota
Decided July 23, 2025No. 0:24-cv-01310Unknown
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA Stacey A.,1 Case No. 24-cv-1310 (DJF) Plaintiff, v. ORDER Frank Bisignano2, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant. Pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), Plaintiff Stacey A. (“Plaintiff”) seeks judicial review of the Commissioner of Social Security’s (“Commissioner”) final decision denying her applications for Disabled Widow(er)’s Benefits (“DWB”) and Supplemental Security Income (“SSI”) under Titles II and XVI of the Social Security Act (“Decision”). This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff’s Motion For Summary Judgment (“Motion”) (ECF No.…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Biestek v. BerryhillSupreme Court of the United States · 2019
- Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Bowen v. YuckertSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Sheila J. Young v. Kenneth S. Apfel, Commissioner of Social SecurityCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2000
- Danny KEETON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1994
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.