Legal Opinion · Dissent

Johns v. Marlow

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided October 17, 2001No. A01A1557Published

1DissentAndrews, Presiding Judge

Because I agree with the trial court’s conclusion that Marlow was entitled to summary judgment because nothing but guesses and speculation were posited by plaintiff Johns in opposition to Marlow’s motion for summary judgment, I respectfully dissent.

To obtain summary judgment, a defendant need not produce any evidence but must only point to an absence of evidence supporting at least one essential element of the plaintiff’s claim. Lau’s Corp. v. Haskins, 261 Ga. 491 (405 SE2d 474) (1991).

Where the inference of negligence allowed by the fact that Bones was in the road when struck by Johns is…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Lau's Corp., Inc. v. HaskinsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1991
  2. Porier v. SpiveyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1958
  3. John Hewell Trucking Co., Inc. v. BrockCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1999
  4. Carver v. KinnettCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1993
  5. Wilkins v. BeverlyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1971

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API