Legal Opinion
Board of County Commissioners v. Federal Housing Finance Agency
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided June 13, 2014No. 13-7114PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion for the Court filed by Senior Circuit Judge SENTELLE.
SENTELLE, Senior Circuit Judge:
The Board of County Commissioners of Kay County appeals the district court’s dismissal of its complaint seeking a declaratory judgment that the Federal National Mortgage Association (Fannie Mae) and the Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation (Freddie Mac), along with the Federal Housing Finance Agency (FHFA) as their conservator, violated state law by failing to pay Oklahoma’s documentary stamp tax (the “Transfer Tax”). The district court held that all of the entities were exempt from the tax pursuant…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- United States v. MorrisonSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Gwaltney of Smithfield, Ltd. v. Chesapeake Bay Foundation, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Jimenez v. QuartermanSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Lopez v. GonzalesSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
- Federal Land Bank of St. Paul v. Bismarck Lumber Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Ramirez v. U.S. Immigration & Customs EnforcementCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
- City of Spokane v. Federal National Mortgage Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
- Montgomery County Commission v. Federal Housing Finance AgencyCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2015
- Town of Johnston v. Federal Housing Finance AgencyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2014
- Board of Commissioners of Montgomery County v. Federal Housing Finance AgencyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2014
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.