Legal Opinion
Goldberger v. Goldberger
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided March 29, 1990PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMahoney, P. J.
Plaintiff moved to decrease the $750 per week that he was temporarily ordered to pay defendant pending the outcome of the parties’ divorce action. The application was denied by Supreme Court and this appeal followed. Plaintiff argues that the court erred in denying his request for modification, claiming that there has been a significant change of circumstances and that the award was improper in not setting specific amounts as child support and as maintenance. We affirm.
We have consistently held that modification of temporary awards should rarely be made (see, e.g., Schelling v Schelling, 145…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Holmes v. HolmesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
- Schelling v. SchellingAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
3Cited by9 opinions
- Bell v. BellAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
- Suydam v. SuydamAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
- Marr v. MarrAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
- Charnock v. CharnockAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
- Fox v. FoxAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.