Legal Opinion

Goodman v. Stein

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 21, 1941Published

1Dissent

' Martin, P. J.

(dissenting). The attitude of this court on the subject of examinations before trial in tort actions and the reason for the rule are clearly expressed in Shaw v. Samley Realty Co., Inc. (201 App. Div. 433). The wisdom of that decision has many times been demonstrated.

The right to examine an adverse party before trial is the result of legislation enacted to relieve litigants of the handicap at common law under which a party was not a competent witness in an action. (Lotz v. Standard Vulcanite Pan Co., 102 Misc. 68.) The statute limits the scope of the examination to testimony…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Shaw v. Samley Realty Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1922
  2. Lotz v. Standard Vulcanite Pan Co.Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1917
  3. Kematjian v. Island Cab Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1935
  4. Landrau v. Guaranty Trust Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API