Legal Opinion

San Antonio ex rel. City Public Service Board v. United States

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided June 9, 1980No. Nos. 78-2051, 78-2216 and 78-2307PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion for the Court filed by Circuit Judge WILKEY.

WILKEY, Circuit Judge:

This action arises on petitions to review orders of the Interstate Commerce Commission (ICC or Commission) served 25 October 1978 and 1 June 1979, which prescribed maximum reasonable rates for unit-train shipments of coal from Cordero Junction, Wyoming to Elmendorf, Texas, a suburb of San Antonio, Texas.1 This case marks the second time that a court has been called upon to review a final order of the ICC setting a maximum reasonable rate for the above described traffic. In a decision served 14 October 1976 (San Antonio…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Federal Power Commission v. Hope Natural Gas Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
  2. Permian Basin Area Rate CasesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  3. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. Wichita Board of TradeSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. Aberdeen & Rockfish R. Co. v. Students Challenging Regulatory Agency Procedures (SCRAP)Supreme Court of the United States · 1975
  5. Board of Trade of Kansas City v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. San Antonio, Texas Acting by and Through Its City Public Service Board v. United States of America and Interstate Commerce Commission, Burlington Northern, Inc., Intervenors. State of Texas v. United States of America and Interstate Commerce Commission, Burlington Northern, Inc., Intervenors. Burlington Northern, Inc. v. United States of America and Interstate Commerce Commission, City of San Antonio, Texas, IntervenorsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1980

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API