Legal Opinion
INGRAM v. COUNTY OF CAMDEN
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided August 26, 2022No. 1:14-cv-05519Unknown
1Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY XAVIER INGRAM : CIVIL ACTION : v. : No. 14-5519 : COUNTY OF CAMDEN, et al. : MEMORANDUM Chief Judge Juan R. Sánchez August 26, 2022 The parties in this matter entered into a settlement agreement in the amount of $10,000,000. Counsel for Plaintiff Xavier Ingram subsequently filed a Motion for Attorney Fees pursuant to New Jersey Rule of Court 1:21-7, which sets limits for contingent fee agreements in New Jersey state and federal courts. Ingram’s counsel asks the Court to set a fee of 33⅓% of the settlement amount exceeding…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Dunn v. H. K. Porter Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1979
- Hymen Schlesinger and David A. Hensler v. Hon. Hubert Teitelbaum, United States District JudgeCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1973
- In Re Bath & Kitchen Fixtures Antitrust LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2008
- Kirk Mitzel Janet Mitzel, H/w v. Westinghouse Electric Corporation Dravo Corporation Dick Corporation Cortec Industries, Inc., T/a, D/B/A Inland Buildings Davy McKee Corporation, T/a, D/B/A Davy Dravo Dravo Engineering Companies, Inc. Cortec Industries, Inc., T/a, D/B/A Summit Buildings S.B. Acquisition Company, T/a, D/B/A Summit Buildings, Dick Corporation Dravo Corporation, Third-Party v. A.C. Dellovade, Inc. Davy McKee Corporation, T/a, D/B/A Davy Dravo, Third-Party Kirk Mitzel and Janet Mitzel, by and With Their Attorneys, a Dragon AssociatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1995
- Wurtzel v. WerresNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1985
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.