Legal Opinion
Miravich v. Township of Exeter
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
Decided October 28, 2010PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION BY appeal from the order of the Court of Common Pleas of Berks County, dismissing their land use appeal. The Protestants, who own land adjacent and near to a proposed 34-lot development on land owned by Intervener Metrodev V (Landowner), appealed from the approval by the Exeter Township (Township) Board of Supervisors (Board) of the Preliminary Subdivision and Land Development application for 26 of the lots in question. 1 Common pleas held that the Protestants lacked standing to appeal the Township’s approval. We reverse.
President Judge LEADBETTER.
John J. and Patricia J. Miravieh, Sue…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Leoni v. Whitpain Township Zoning Hearing BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
- Edwards Engineering Corp. v. DaviesCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
- In Re Rouse & Associates Ship Road Land Ltd. PartnershipCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
3Cited by13 opinions
- Berner v. Montour TownshipCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
- Miravich v. Township of ExeterCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
- Whitehall Manor, Inc. v. Planning CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
- J. Worthington v. Mount Pleasant Twp.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2019
- S. Davis-Haas v. Exeter Twp. ZHB and MetroDev V, LP and Exeter Twp.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.