Legal Opinion

Turner Trust Co. v. Gillett

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided December 4, 1922PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtMccarthy, J.

This is an action on a promissory note executed and delivered to respondent by appellants. As an affirmative defense, appellants, who were defendants in the court below, alleged that they entered into an agreement with respondent by which it sold and promised to deliver to them sufficient water in the Bancroft Land & Irrigation Com*345pany’s canal to irrigate 80 acres of land at the agreed price of $400, of which amount $40 was paid in cash, and appellants executed and delivered the promissory note sued on, for the balance; that, as a part of said agreement, respondent warranted that it had title…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. McMullen v. Butler & Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1903
  2. Hayes v. FlesherIdaho Supreme Court · 1921
  3. Sheetz v. LongloisIndiana Supreme Court · 1880
  4. Walker v. RobinsonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1915
  5. Coleman v. LuetckeCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1914

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. E. T. Chapin Co. v. ScottIdaho Supreme Court · 1927

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API