Legal Opinion

Maienfisch v. Bleakney

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided September 25, 1934No. Appeals, 222 and 223Published

1Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam,

These appeals are from the refusal of the court below to' grant a new trial after verdict for defendant in a suit to recover damages for personal injuries received by the minor plaintiff when struck by an automobile driven by defendant’s son, acting under the control and direction of his father, who, although not the owner of the car, was present therein at the time of the accident. Appellants seek a new trial for the purpose of introducing evidence which they term after-discovered but which the record discloses was known to plaintiffs’ counsel at the time of the trial, and could…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Hunter v. BremerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1917
  2. Hinman v. HinmanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1925

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API