Legal Opinion

Mack v. Kellogg Brown & Root, Inc.

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided September 13, 2006No. 2005-CA-1245PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

CHARLES R. JONES, Judge.

h The Appellant, Reggie Mack, appeals the judgment of the district court granting the Motion for Partial Summary Judgment in favor of the Appellees, Kellogg Brown & Root, Inc. (KBR), and EPL Pipeline, L.L.C., thereby dismissing the Appellant’s claims for negligence against EPL and/or KBR, under both the Jones Act and the General Maritime Law. For the reasons that follow, we affirm.

Statement of the Facts and Procedural History

Reggie Mack, while employed as a rigger by KBR, alleges that on, or about, *56June 17, 2001, he attempted to lift a piece of pipe by himself while…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Schroeder v. Board of Sup'rsSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1991
  2. Independent Fire Ins. Co. v. Sunbeam Corp.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 2000
  3. Prado v. Sloman Neptun Schiffahrts, AGLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1992
  4. Boudreaux v. USACourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2002
  5. Foster v. Destin Trading Corp.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1997

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Dane Thomas v. State of Louisiana, The Department of Wildlife and FisheriesLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API