Legal Opinion

McNeill v. Edie

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided July 15, 1880PublishedCited by 17 opinions

Error from Osage District Court. At the November Term, 1875, of the district court, Edie, as sheriff, etc., and the Osage City Savings Bank, as defendants, had judgment against McNeill, as plaintiff, who brings the case here. The facts are sufficiently stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

*109The opinion of the court was delivered by

Horton, C. J.:

On November 9, 1874, the Osage City Savings Bank commenced an action against J. M. McNeill, in the district court of Osage county, setting forth in its petition a cause of action upon a certain promissory note, dated June 12, 1874, of the sum of $209, payable ninety days after date, to the Osage City Savings Bank, and executed by said McNeill. The summons issued in the case was returned on the 13th day of November, 1874, with the following indorsements thereon :_

“Sheriff’s Office, Osage County, Kansas.
“Received the within summons the 9th…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Mastin v. GraySupreme Court of Kansas · 1878
  2. Chambers Bros. & Co. v. King Wrought-Iron Bridge ManufactorySupreme Court of Kansas · 1876
  3. Hanson v. WolcottSupreme Court of Kansas · 1877
  4. Butcher v. Bank of BrownsvilleSupreme Court of Kansas · 1863
  5. Case v. HannahsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1864

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Smoot v. JuddSupreme Court of Missouri · 1904
  2. In re Senate File 31Nebraska Supreme Court · 1889
  3. Smith v. MorrillColorado Court of Appeals · 1898
  4. Eayrs v. NasonNebraska Supreme Court · 1898
  5. Insurance Co. of North America v. LittleSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API