Legal Opinion

People v. Arroyo

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 24, 1986PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Despite the fact that burglary in the second degree may be committed by either entering or remaining unlawfully on the premises (Penal Law § 140.25), the instant indictment charged that the defendant had "entered and remained unlawfully” (emphasis supplied). The trial court did not err, however, in instructing the jury that they could render a verdict of guilty upon either finding (see, People v Charles, 61 NY2d 321; People v Rooney, 57 NY2d 822). Nor did it abuse its discretion (see, People v Reising, 106 AD2d 522) in refusing to adjourn the imposition of sentence, since the information in…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. People v. SuitteAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
  2. People v. CharlesNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
  3. People v. RooneyNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
  4. People v. ReisingAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. People v. FeltonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
  2. People v. BynumAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2019
  3. People v. EllingtonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API