Miller v. Atlantic Refining Co.
Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County
1Opinion of the Court
CRUMLISH, J.,
— This is an action in trespass for personal injuries. A trial jury was had; the jury failed to reach a verdict and were discharged. Defendant subsequently filed a motion for judgment non obstante veredicto upon the whole record. We are asked now to rule upon that motion. Technically, under the Act of April 20, 1911, P. L. 70, sec. 1, 12 PS §684, defendant’s proper motion is for judgment on the whole record, not for judgment n. o. v. We will treat the motion as one for judgment on the whole record, defendant’s requests for binding instructions having been refused.
Defendant is the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Harris (Et Ux.) v. Lewistown Tr. Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
- McLaughlin v. KellySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1911
- Brown v. WhiteSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1902
- Folkman v. LauerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1914
- Cunningham v. RogersSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1909
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Miller v. Atlantic Refining Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1958