Legal Opinion

Aerovox Corp. v. United States

District Court, D. Massachusetts

Decided March 27, 1950No. Civ. A. No. 8526Published

1Opinion of the Court

FORD, District Judge.

This is an action under the Contract Settlement Act of 1944, 41 U.S.C.A. §§ 101-125, for the recovery of compensation to which the plaintiff contends it is equitably entitled under § 7(f) of that Act, 41 U.S.C.A. § 107(f).

Plaintiff is a, Massachusetts corporation doing business in Massachusetts. During the recent war it was engaged in production1 of. electrical equipment for war purposes. Frank Reiber, Inc.; of Los Angeles, California, which had a prime contract with the Army Air Force in 1945, ordered certain condensers to be manufactured by plaintiff under a…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Lynch v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  2. Merritt v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  3. Tempel v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1918
  4. Kal MacH. Works, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1946
  5. Precision Metal & MacHine Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1946

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API